This has been an amazing experience thus far, and it’s only the end of the first day. I want to reflect upon each of the individual presentations as I go through this conference, so this reflection and tomorrow’s reflection will both be partitioned, with tomorrow’s also having a concluding portion for the entire conference.
Opening Keynote – Mike Slaughter
Before Mike ever came up to the podium (I can’t exactly call it a pulpit, per se, because Ginghamsburg is not exactly a traditional church setting; it’s more of a podium-type stand on a raised platform just in front of the stage, while the sanctuary is much more like a theater than a traditional sanctuary), there was a presentation being shown on the screen which put forth something that I had considered but had never really been able to put into words. It said: “What if church was not where you go but what you do? Church is a verb.”
I spent the last year at the church I was serving wondering what it was God wanted me to do to make the church relevant to the community again. I think I may have discussed this before, but I need to once again say that where I was serving was a church on hospice care. The folks were only interested in maintaining the status quo at all costs, which will inevitably lead to the death of the church. It was not involved with the community. Furthermore, the parishioners had alienated many of the people in the community, who viewed the church as closed and cliquish and unwelcoming (to be honest, it was). This message, appearing in this slide, summed up in sixteen words what I could not verbalize in eleven months of ministry there. These sixteen words have given me the language, the framework, in which to express a vision for the church, no matter where that church may be.
That being said, there were some things that Mike brought out in his talk that really struck me, things that I didn’t realize. The UMC is using industrial management methods, comparable to those used by the US automobile industry, and as a result, attendance has dropped 52% since 1960. 74% of United Methodist churches are rural, yet 84% of the population lives in urban and suburban areas. These two factors, I see, are working against the continuation of the United Methodist Church in its current configuration.
With those factoids, which are admittedly important enough to me for me to include them, there were two specific things that Mike said that really stay with me. First, we need leaders who will lead with courage and not compliance. This one hits home with me, particularly because, upon reflection, this is how I was pastoring the church last year. My mentor continually reminded me of this by using the analogy of me being a fish in the church’s stream. While that may have been the case in the past, and while I tried to live into that while I was pastor there, I see how that handcuffed me to attempting to function within their paradigm of church, a paradigm that obviously was not working, considering the state of that particular church. I see that in the church I am currently attending as well, how the church I attend is a “Sunday-go-to-meeting” church, and there are no activities during the week. While I can’t just jump up and launch activities any time I would like, I am definitely going to get involved with my current church in a way that expands the church, that looks to the other six days of the week and sees what I can do, as a lay person, to leverage the time that the building stands idle and unpopulated. The town in which my current church stands is considerably larger than where I was last year, and as such has that many more people in the local parish to which to minister. As a Christian and a disciple, it is my responsibility to find the needs of the people and do what I can to help them meet those needs.
The other thing that Mike said was that Ginghamsburg doesn’t use the word “volunteer” anymore, but rather the term “unpaid servant.” The rationale for this seemingly minor semantic change was remarkable. Volunteer implies that one serves at one’s convenience. A servant, meanwhile, is at the service of his or her master, in this case, the Holy Spirit and the needs of the people. While this change of language and corresponding attitude is definitely a cultural shift within the church, I want to be a servant, not a volunteer.
The real focus of Mike’s talk was about the hermeneutic of Jesus, namely getting the power of heaven on earth and getting the church into the world. As the church, we are supposed to take care of the infirm, the widows, the orphans. We are supposed to clothe those with no clothing, feed those who are hungry, help those who are poor and needy and suffering. That’s what I was raised in the church to believe. But I really haven’t been in a church that has done all it can to do these things. Maybe it takes just one person to start the ball rolling. Maybe evangelism needs to be done by demonstration rather than proclamation. Maybe making disciples shouldn’t be the focus, but rather making decisions to do mission and acting on those decisions and actually going out and doing mission and letting the transformation and discipleship come along afterward (but not neglecting the needs of those who have had that transformation, nor the needs of those who are seeking that transformation, for mission without discipleship is works justification, just as discipleship without mission is faith without works, which, as James said, is dead). Either way, it’s obvious that the way we’ve been doing church isn’t working, and something needs to change. Mike said that in order to recover the hermeneutic of Jesus, our model must be missional rather than attractional. I don’t know about anyone else, but I’m willing to try.
Breakout session 1 – Mike Berry
The first breakout session I attended was that of a young pastor named Mike Berry. He came out of Ginghamsburg and has implemented many of Ginghamsburg’s cultural values into the church he pastors, resulting in a tremendous growth. I’ll admit, I didn’t find him nearly as compelling as Mike Slaughter, but he said a couple of things that stuck with me as well.
Mike started his session with this question: do you believe that God is going to change the lives of the people in your church every week? After my experience last year, I struggled with this. Do I hope and pray for this? Did I hope and pray for this every week? Absolutely. Did I believe it was going to happen? At first, yes, but after four or five months, I couldn’t believe it anymore. Folks weren’t at the church for the message or for learning or for becoming disciples, they were there because it was habit. I saw that and I knew that and I think it really affected the way I worked with that church. I think it was part of the reason I led with compliance rather than courage. Anytime I tried to do something different, anytime I approached church with something other than what the parishioners considered proper and appropriate reverence and behavior, they complained, either among themselves or to the DS, but never did they say anything to me. Honestly, I’m afraid that wherever I may go next, I may do the same thing. I need to pray for courage to do the right thing rather than what is acceptable to the parishioners. I need to invite the Holy Spirit into the life of the church, and if that convicts some of the folks there to leave, then I need to be able to remember that the will of God will be done, and I am just a tool in His hands to do His work here on earth. I know that I’m not strong enough for all that on my own, I know that I’m not a natural leader, I know that I’m not an extrovert, I know that I’m not the person that people will pick to go out front and to be the spokesperson. However, I also know that I have been called by God to be in His ministry, and I need to remember to let Him work through me.
The other thing Mike said was in relation to sermon writing. There are two questions that need to be asked at the beginning and end of every sermon. First: What do I want them to know? Second: What do I want them to do? I have not yet had a class on homiletics, so I don’t know if this is standard sermon-writing practice, but these are questions that will stay with me whenever I craft a sermon in the future.
Keynote 2 – Ron Sider
Ron Sider gave the next keynote address, specifically upon the church’s relations with the poor. Much of this was information I had heard before in some form or another, so very little of it really stuck with me. Ron did give an interesting discussion of power and how it was based upon capital because we live in a market economy, but as I said, I had heard all this in one form or another before, and none of it was really new or particularly interesting to me.
Breakout 2 – Sue Nilson Kibbey
Sue is the executive pastor at Ginghamsburg, and, as part of her responsibilities, manages the servanthood (not volunteer) programs. She started her presentation with this statement: “People in our churches have forgotten how to dream. Church leaders have inadvertently created this environment.” I hadn’t really thought about this before now, but she’s right. The churches I have attended have been all about programs and control and a handful of people having controlling access to all the programs and training and ministries. It’s one thing to have a number of ministries put in place by the pastor or church council or whomever is in charge, but it’s something completely different to have a church where everyone is encouraged to develop their own ministries for the good of God’s kingdom. It’s a reconception of the church as not a fortress where people can come for spiritual shelter, but rather the church as a launch pad, where people can come to get the fuel needed to go out and begin their own ministries. It’s tied in with gifts and graces, and encouraging everyone in the church to learn what their gifts and graces are, and encouraging them to use those gift and graces for the glory of the Kingdom. It’s about changing the church from the status quo of “doing church” to a new normal of “doing worship” through ministries each of us is uniquely gifted to do.
Sue also spoke of what she called “mindshifts” in this process. One of these has really made me think. She said that people will make time for world-changing priorities, if they see and understand them as such. Our assumption, one which is tied in with the linguistic shift from volunteer to servant, is that people are too busy, and if we ask them to do something, we will be interfering with their schedules, and we become apologetic or minimize the activity. I hadn’t thought about this in these terms. I know that if there is something that I view as life-changing or world-changing, I will shuffle my schedule around, I will make time for it. I guess the best example in my own life right now is the foster parent courses that are about to finish. It was terribly inconvenient to give up my Saturdays (which were my Sabbath) in order to be trained to become a therapeutic foster parent, but I know that being a foster parent can change the life of a child or a number of children throughout our lifetimes, so I was willing to sacrifice my Sabbath for that eight or nine weeks of coursework, so that I could make a change in the world, so that I could make a change in someone’s life. Yeah, it interfered with my schedule. Yeah, I was busy. But I wasn’t so busy that I wasn’t willing to seize an opportunity to change a child’s life for the better. I understand what she means. I also realize that just because I understand doesn’t mean everyone else will, or that everyone else can do the things I can and am willing to do. I hope and pray that wherever I end up in the church, God can use me to show others that what may seem simple to them, what may seem inconvenient to them, are things that can change the lives of others and can change the world.
More tomorrow.
Yours in Christ,
Larry